Study Group Co-Chairs
Dr. Dacian C. DRAGOS
Babes Bolyai University (Romania)
Dr. Philip LANGBROEK
Utrecht University (The Netherlands)
Dr. François LAFARGE
University of Strasbourg, ENA (France)
Dr. Paulien WILLEMSEN
Utrecht University (The Netherlands)
Schedule
Click here for the list of papers
| Wednesday, 07/09/2011 | |
| 14.30 pm -16.15 pm | Conference Opening Session
|
| 16.30 pm – 18.30 pm
|
Session 1 : Ombudsman’s studies
Chair : Philip LANGBROEK
Gavin DREWRY, Royal Holloway, University of London (UK) Parliamentary Involvement in choosing an Ombudsman- some recent developments in the UK Discussant: Philip LANGBROEK
Milan REMAC and Philip LANGBROEK, Utrecht University (The Netherlands) The normative function of ombudsman between citizens, public administration and courts Discussant: E. SAYGIN
E. SAYGIN, Ataturk University (Turkey) Turkey’s Ombudsman: A Real Ombudsman? Discussant: Milan REMAC
I.M. CONRADSEN, Roskilde University (Denmark) The end of administrative appeal? The case of the Danish Patient Ombudsman Discussant: Gavin DREWRY Publication Plan: P. LANGBROEK
|
| Thursday, 08/09/2011 | |
| 08.45 am – 10.30 am | Session 2 : EU law
Chair: François LAFARGE
François LAFARGE, University of Strasbourg, ENA (France) Administrative Networks and Administrative Cooperation within the EU Discussant: Michael GOTZE
Agne LIMANTE, Vilnius University (Lithuania) Actions for Annulment before ECJ after the Lisbon Treaty: Has the Access to Justice Improved? Discussant: François LAFARGE
Michael GOTZE, Copenhagen University (Denmark) The Citizen’s Right to Effective Information Discussant: Agne LIMANTE
|
| 10.30 am – 11.00 am | Coffee Break |
| 11.00 am – 12.30 pm | Session 3 : Effective adjudication
Chair: Paulien WILLEMSEN
A.T.(Bert) MARSEILLE, K.J. (Kars) de GRAAF and H.D. (Hanna)TOLSMA, University of Groningen (The Netherlands) The effectiveness of the Dutch Informal Pro-active Approach Model Discussant: Bengt VERBEECK
Ludo VENY, Ivo CARLENS, Bengt VERBEECK, University of Ghent (Belgium) Red tape, lawyers and the burden of proof: legal speed bumps on the road to effective adjudication? Discussant: A.T. (Bert) MARSEILLE
|
| 12.30 pm – 14.00 pm | Lunch Break |
| 14.00 pm – 16.00 pm |
Polona KOVAČ, University of Ljubljana (Slovenia) Fighting Administrative Silence-from traditional fiction of negative act to the recognition of a claim? Discussant: K.J. (Kars) de GRAAF
Alexander BALTHASAR, Robert MÜLLER-TÖRÖK and Alexander PROSSER, BKA (Austria) E-participation in the Field of Administrative Law: An Austrian Initiative to Meet European Challenges Discussant: Philip LANGBROEK
|
| 16.00 -16.30 | Coffee break |
16.30 -18.30 |
Session 4: Open platform: Research projects proposals
Chair: Philip LANGBROEK
The Study Group X of EGPA is an open space dedicated to researches at the crossroad between law and administration. One of its purposes is to bring together scholars interested in the same topics. Some research projects are already running between the participants. Some others are under elaboration.This is a reason why a session dedicated to research project presentations has been scheduled during our meeting.Feel free use this time to present your ongoing or would be projects, get feedbacks and enroll people!Paper : Susana GALERA, Rey Juan Carlos University (Spain) Rule of law and global governance
|
| Friday, 09/09/2011 | |
| 08.45 – 12.00
(incl. Coffee break) |
Session 5 : Public Administration
Chair: Dacian C. DRAGOS
Emil BALAN and Gabriela VARIA, National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Faculty of Public Administration (Romania) Romanian Public Administration in the light of the Constitutional Provisions. Where to? Discussant: Gyorgy GAJDUSCHEK
Crina RADULESCU, NSPSPA (Romania) Adjustment of Administrative Law (principles and legal norms) to the requirements for a more efficient Public Administration Discussant: S. SKULOVA
Sonia SKULOVA, Faisal HUSSEINI, Masaryk University (Czech Republic); Klara PROKOPOVA and Marta VRBOVA Principles of good administration as a factor in effective decision-making by administrative authorities and administrative courts, with accent on the principle of predictability and the principle of proper statement of reasons (“Czech Republic” case study) Discussant: Gabriela VARIA
Gyorgy GAJDUSCHEK, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Hungary) Measuring effectivity of law enforcement of Hungarian regulatory agencies Discussant: C. RADULESCU
|
| 13.00 pm – 14.30 pm | Lunch Break |
| 14.30 pm – 16.30 pm | EGPA General Assembly and Closing Session
|